Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 One step forward, two back, in fight for reproductive rights 

One step forward, two back, in fight for reproductive rights

THIS week's announcement by Marie Stopes International that clients of its clinics in Victoria, NSW, Queensland, the ACT and Western Australia can now terminate pregnancies at less than nine weeks using RU486 is one more step in Australian women's struggle for full equality and reproductive rights.

RU486 has had a chequered history in this country. For many years it was effectively banned as a result of a deal brokered by both major parties to secure former senator Brian Harradine's vote to sell Telstra. Only in 2006, as a result of the efforts of a cross-party group of female senators was the law changed, allowing RU486 to be regulated like all other drugs.

A pharmaceutical company will soon apply for and be granted a general licence to import and market the drug. Medicos will finally be able to dispense the drug like all others, by prescription and on the basis of patient need. But just as one door opens, several others threaten to slam shut.

The most worrying development is in Queensland, where a teenage girl is being prosecuted for having an abortion. Yes, you heard right. Next month Tegan Leach, 19, will return to court with her boyfriend to defend charges that he gave her RU486, and she used it, to abort an unwanted pregnancy.

The couple seem certain to be found guilty. Abortion is in the criminal code in Queensland, and the facts of the case suggest the young woman and her boyfriend did the "crime". That is, having discovered they were pregnant, and judging themselves too young to be parents, they obtained RU486 with the intention of causing her to miscarry.

You might think that in the face of this impending travesty pro-choice Premier Anna Bligh would be looking for ways to help. First and foremost, you might think that Bligh would be preparing a bill to present to Parliament to reform an antiquated law that makes one of the safest and most common medical procedures a felony.

You would be wrong. Instead, in a staggering display of ignorance and obfuscation, Bligh has done her damndest to convince Queenslanders that Leach's situation is anomalous. Something to do with the fact that the drug she took, RU486, was not prescribed by a doctor or isn't approved for general use. In reply to the truth - that what has happened to the teenager could happen to any Queensland man, woman or medico involved with abortion as long as the procedure remains a crime - she has burbled about the need for a private member's bill to come before parliament for the issue to be decided.

Bligh, and the Government she leads, could move to change the law tomorrow and should, given that removing abortion from the Crimes Act is Labor Party policy and Bligh made numerous backroom promises before the most recent election that she would reform the law if she won. Queensland Labor: compromised one day, craven the next. One wonders exactly what has to happen to women in Queensland before their politicians act to represent them.

Luckily for women in Victoria, political integrity and guts are more plentiful at Spring Street. We are going to need them. After successful reform of Victoria's abortion law last year - reform that means no Victorian teenager will ever have to endure what Tegan Leach is going through - pro-life forces are up in arms.

At a recent conference in Melbourne, on the subject of conscience no less, pro-life doctors lambasted Victoria's Abortion Law Reform Act for requiring them to perform an abortion in an emergency. Instead they seem to feel they have a right to let their female patients die. They plan to take a test case to court.

Their chances of winning are nearly zero. Even the most restrictive definition of a medical professional's duty of care requires assistance to be rendered in an emergency.

But truckloads of taxpayer resources will be consumed in defending the case through the assertion, I would assume, that in a liberal, plural democracy, women have rights, too. Namely, a right to equality before the law and to be treated as more than human incubators whose lives are worth little, or nothing at all.

Dr Leslie Cannold is a medical ethicist and the president of Reproductive Choice Australia and ProChoice Victoria, which played a key role in lifting the ban on RU486 and changing Victoria's abortion laws.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Tegan Leach and her boyfriend have been charged because they allegedly used an illegally imported Chinese-made version of RU486 and obtained it illegally. A fact Leslie Cannold has to chosen to ignore in her article.
Posted by newtaste, 11/08/2009 8:59:54 PM
Absolutely unbelievable! What a disgrace.
Posted by LakeMacResident, 12/08/2009 1:28:23 AM
Same spin as usual. Standing up for your (womens) rights again. Pity when that happens the rights of unborn children are extinguished, much like their lives. The unborn child has no voice of their own and need their champions to defend them. Historically the unborn child has had the right to life and that position should be defended.
Posted by Andy, 12/08/2009 9:59:22 AM
There is one distinct problem with Cannold’s argument which is 40 years too old. There is no debate about the right to equality for women. It is an unfortunate reality that feminists in the 1970’s were duped by the belief that aborting babies would mean equality in the workforce with men. Why should neo liberal values dominate in this value driven argument? Equality is a perfectly justifiable expectation for every human being, whether young or old, sick or well, with or without disability, dominant race or minority. Intrinsically every human is of value. The problem with Cannold’s argument is that she fails to acknowledge which human life is worth fighting for. Who defines that? Genetic science has known for decades that a human being’s genetic coding is complete from conception, nothing is added before birth, except time and nutrients. This indicates that humans both in utero and after birth have value. If the rhetoric of choice was truly about equality, then value would be accredited to both mother and child, and genuine options given that support all. What Cannold wants is for women to carry the burden of their ‘choice’ silently, rather than society supporting women...
Posted by AEW, 12/08/2009 11:47:34 AM
We talk a lot about the rights of people to do virtually whatever they want these days. But where is the acknowledgement of responsibility? If this young couple have decided they are to young to be having children then maybe they should be avoiding the activity that causes pregnancy. If people have sex there is always a risk they will fall pregnant and if that happens they should stand up and deal with it. Why should a life be allowed to be snuffed out simply because people are unwilling to face to consiquences of their actions?
Posted by DAR, 27/08/2009 2:56:53 PM
full equality and reproductive rights should include making child protection reports when women and men report an abusive relationship - but for some unknown reason, women are not held to account while they defraud the system and take others for a ride of no hope. 3 or more claims of abuse, and not one report to child protection - then some stupid claim of equal rights comes along. Sorry but if I imported illegal drugs I would be locked up for 5 years simply becasue of my gender, without any bearing on relationship or reproductive status. Wana try equality - then perhaps provision of housing equal to what a woman aquires for not saving up 1 cent would be nice too. Call it a thankyou for allowing you to have a child and remove any chance I could of had in my life of poverty.
Posted by one, 9/09/2009 2:57:21 AM
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!
Dr Leslie Cannold
Dr Leslie Cannold

Most popular articles




Dungog Chronicle







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...